Which type of covenants cannot pass to successors in title by themselves?

Prepare for the CILEx Conveyancing Level 6 Exam with our quiz. Study flashcards and multiple choice questions, with tips, hints, and explanations. Get exam-ready!

Multiple Choice

Which type of covenants cannot pass to successors in title by themselves?

Explanation:
Positive covenants impose an affirmative duty to do something, and under traditional conveyancing principles they do not automatically bind future owners. For a covenant to run with the land and bind successors, there needs to be privity of estate and the covenant must touch and concern the land in a way that makes it a property obligation. A positive covenant, by its nature, creates a personal duty between the original parties and does not by itself attach to the land for future owners to be bound. That’s why positive covenants cannot pass to successors in title by themselves. In contrast, restrictive (negative) covenants are suited to running with the land and binding future owners, provided the other requirements for running with the land are met.

Positive covenants impose an affirmative duty to do something, and under traditional conveyancing principles they do not automatically bind future owners. For a covenant to run with the land and bind successors, there needs to be privity of estate and the covenant must touch and concern the land in a way that makes it a property obligation. A positive covenant, by its nature, creates a personal duty between the original parties and does not by itself attach to the land for future owners to be bound. That’s why positive covenants cannot pass to successors in title by themselves. In contrast, restrictive (negative) covenants are suited to running with the land and binding future owners, provided the other requirements for running with the land are met.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy